- Rethinking Relativity, by Tom Bethell, and related links (on Petr Beckmann’s anti-Einsteinian theories)
- Einstein Plus Two–brochures of Petr Beckmann’s work, interviews, related dissident physics material
- //Galilean Electrodynamics// (founded by Petr Beckmann)
- Physics Forum: Discussion of Lewis Little’s “Theory of Elementary Waves”
- TEWLIP: Theory of Elementary Waves (TEW) Listserv
- George Marklin: Objectivist Physics
- David Harriman’s Objectivist Approach to Physics
- General Lorentz Ether Theory
- Journal of Objective Science
Norman S. Kinsella: Intellectual Property and Tech Law
{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }
Dear Sir,
The above mentioned website promotes a dragged ether that exactly predicts stellar aberration!
The gravitational pull, because of the continious presence of ether, doesn’t need to be faster than light.
I understand that the SRT was developed because stellar aberration could not be reconciled with ether. In other words science was not able to explain stellar aberration with ether.
It appears that the omission is that science unjustified denied the possibility of dragged ether.
Should science not just simply adopt dragged ether now there is a valid explanation.
Regards,
Elly