| |
KinsellaLaw Web Log
• BLOG ARCHIVES
Saturday, November 11, 2006
de Gramont Blurb on Rubins-Kinsella International Law Book:
Latest blurb on my book International Investment, Political Risk, and Dispute Resolution: A Practitioner's Guide published last year:
I've been reading through your book International Investment, Political Risk and Dispute Resolution. It is a remarkably helpful, well-written, and well-researched work. It is quite scholarly and at the same time a thoroughly practical and useful guide."
--Alexandre de Gramont, Crowell & Moring LLP 
Tuesday, November 07, 2006
Reengineering the Patent Examination Process: Two Suggestions:
Re my previous post about suggestions to eliminate substantive patent examination, I was just made aware of D.C. Toedt, "Reengineering the Patent Examination Process: Two Suggestions," 81 J. Pat. & Trademark Off. Soc'y 462 (1999). This is based on Toedt's suggestion in 1994 "that the PTO steal two ideas from the SEC:
- Suggestion 1: create a convertible "low end" patent (CLEP)
- Suggestion 2: conduct examinations as administrative trials.
Check it out. Email me with any comments.
Monday, November 06, 2006
A RADICAL VIEW ON THE FUTURE OF SUBSTANTIVE PATENT EXAMINATION:
Interesting article in a Malaysian/Singaporean IP firm newsletter (it appears in the Q1/2006 issue of Henry Goh Intellectual Property Updates:
A RADICAL VIEW ON THE FUTURE OF SUBSTANTIVE PATENT EXAMINATION
by Dave A. Wyatt
In recent years, there has been talk of a crisis in the patenting system worldwide. This reflects a concern over growth in the numbers of patent applications being filed and lengthening delays by patent offices in processing the applications through to grant.
Even the patent offices of countries that have traditionally been seen as relatively fast are slowing down under the sheer volume of work. A 2005 survey by the US-based Intellectual Property Owners Association showed that two-thirds of respondents expected the patent granting process in the United States to take longer over the next three years.
People unfamiliar with the world of patents are always surprised that it takes a period of years for a patent to be granted. The principal reason for this delay is the process of substantive examination under which the patentability of the invention is checked by a technicallyqualified examiner.
The reaction of the major patent offices of the world has been to recruit and train ever more examiners, increase sharing and recognition of each other's work, as well as to impose fees that penalize lengthy applications.
Malaysia has not escaped criticism for its delay in examining patent applications, either. It has been proposed that a further 500 patent examiners be recruited to add to the existing 42. However, the author submits that this will not solve the problem locally because of the way examination is currently done in Malaysia for most applications.
Instead, a more radical proposal is made. Do we need substantive examination as a pre-condition for grant of every patent? There are already countries such as France and South Africa whose patent systems do not provide for it. Instead, substantive examination could be made compulsory only prior to starting an infringement action or even sending a preliminary warning letter. A provision under which the Registrar of Patents and third parties could require an application to be examined may also be included.
The grant of an examined patent is never a guarantee of its validity. However, many patented inventions are not commercially exploited and even less are litigated. So, is it not logical that the expense and time of substantive examination be reserved for those that really matter?
Mozy.com Free Online Backup Service:
Just an FYI--for anyone who does not have a good backup service for their computer documents and files: there's a great service i've been using --I have struggled with good backup solutions for a long time. I have tried several. A few months back I stumbled across Mozy.com which I tried and love. It's an online backup service, and does 2GB of storage FREE. It is very cool; seems to work seemlessly, and without error. I set it to backup a few times a day. The first time it backs up, it might take a day or more; but after that, each backup is incremental so it's pretty fast. I use it at home, and also at work. For work I purchased the $4.95/month version which gives you like 30GB or something like that. For home I just use the free version. Actually you get an extra 250MB (a quarter of a GB) of space for every person you refer--I have done this and now have over 5GB of space. In fact if you sign up using someone else's referral link, you start out with 2.25GB instead of 2GB. If you want to try it for backup purposes, click on my referral link (https://mozy.com/?code=P52E8G) to get 2.25GB (instead of just 2.0GB) free space. I've done a few sample backups just to test it (and one time to recover a file I had accidentally deleted), and it worked great. Highly recommended.
|
|
